After we read the book "The True Story of the Three Little Pigs" by Jon Scieszka, you were presented with a lot of different evidence. Some of the evidence suggested that A. Wolf might have been guilty of killing the two little pigs, while other evidence points to his innocence in the case. As a member of the jury, your job was to look at the whole picture, and use the evidence presented to decide whether he had committed the crime or not.
Sometimes when we are looking at a scene, we will find evidence that points us in different directions than we expect. It might be hard to narrow down a suspect, and the clues can sometimes raise more questions than answers. That is why we must always look at all of the evidence to make the best possible conclusion that we can. Hopefully you enjoyed today's lesson as much as I did.
In your blog post for today, you will need to discuss whether you think A. Wolf is guilty or innocence, and use evidence from the trial to justify your decision. Remember: you should try to consider more than one piece of evidence to decide!
In your blog post for today, you will need to discuss whether you think A. Wolf is guilty or innocence, and use evidence from the trial to justify your decision. Remember: you should try to consider more than one piece of evidence to decide!


